Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
Beide Seiten der vorigen Revision Vorhergehende Überarbeitung | |||
bakon-950d [2015/10/02 07:44] karl |
bakon-950d [2015/10/05 23:53] (aktuell) karl |
||
---|---|---|---|
Zeile 10: | Zeile 10: | ||
This design has 2 major disadvantages: | This design has 2 major disadvantages: | ||
- | - Every tip has its own heating element, with it's own characteristic. Therfore there is allways a different temperature error. I have measured 6 different tips with a thermocouple temperature sensor at a constant setting of 400°C. The results were between 335C° and 365°C. \\ As a workaround one can use a lookup table for each tip, which is a bit unpractical. | + | - Every tip has its own heating element, with it's own characteristic. Therfore there is allways a different temperature error. I have measured 6 different tips with a thermocouple temperature sensor at a constant setting of 400°C. The results were between 335C° and 365°C. \\ As a workaround one can use a lookup table for each tip, which is a bit unpractical. \\ Edit: there is an adjustment potentiometer at the controller. Therefore the Error can be reduced to about ±15°C. |
- Since the temperature is measured in the heating wire, that wire is held at a constant temperature. Due to the thermal resistance from the wiire to the tip a big temperature drop is the result on heavy thermal loads. Numerically spoken: The thermal power is reduced by 60%, compared to the ERSA Multi-TC, which has also a nominal power of 75W and a dedicated temperature sensor behind the tip. | - Since the temperature is measured in the heating wire, that wire is held at a constant temperature. Due to the thermal resistance from the wiire to the tip a big temperature drop is the result on heavy thermal loads. Numerically spoken: The thermal power is reduced by 60%, compared to the ERSA Multi-TC, which has also a nominal power of 75W and a dedicated temperature sensor behind the tip. |