osram_nightlux
Unterschiede
Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
| Beide Seiten der vorigen RevisionVorhergehende ÜberarbeitungNächste Überarbeitung | Vorhergehende Überarbeitung | ||
| osram_nightlux [2014/12/03 23:25] – [Osram Nightlux] karl | osram_nightlux [2017/04/04 06:43] (aktuell) – [Deep discharging] karl | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zeile 9: | Zeile 9: | ||
| ===== Measurements ===== | ===== Measurements ===== | ||
| - | Light on: 48...50mA \\ | + | Light on: 48...50mA |
| Light off, approximation sensor active (in dark environment): | Light off, approximation sensor active (in dark environment): | ||
| Light off, approximation sensor inactive (in bright environment): | Light off, approximation sensor inactive (in bright environment): | ||
| Zeile 17: | Zeile 17: | ||
| This seems to be quite realistic. I think, in the average, my devices last for about 10-14 days. | This seems to be quite realistic. I think, in the average, my devices last for about 10-14 days. | ||
| + | ===== Deep discharging ===== | ||
| + | Sadly, no deep discharge protection is implemented. The Light gets weak, when one of the batteries goes below 0.9V, since the impedance of this cell increses. \\ | ||
| + | Once I measured nearly 0V of one NiMH cell, wich is not good. Hopefully the cell recovers. For now, I'm measuring every cell voltage before replacing it with freshly charged ones. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{tag> | ||
osram_nightlux.1417645506.txt.gz · Zuletzt geändert: von karl